The Veblen Vodka: How Sidney Frank Sold $2 Billion of Status by Making Vodka More Expensive
In 1996, an American who didn't speak French and didn't drink vodka set out to build the world's most expensive vodka brand.
Practical A/B testing frameworks, behavioral science, and conversion optimization — for growth leaders responsible for revenue.
In 1996, an American who didn't speak French and didn't drink vodka set out to build the world's most expensive vodka brand.
Something interesting happened quietly in a recent ad platform API release: experiment statistics got pulled directly into the same reporting layer as
Most teams treat the moment a test hits significance like a gun going off at the end of a race. The experiment reaches p<0.
Most stakeholder-submitted hypotheses describe a goal ("make X clearer") instead of an intervention.
There's a moment in most experimentation programs when volume becomes the goal. The team hits a rhythm. The tooling is set up.
A bare point estimate is uninterpretable. This guide walks through the 5 elements that should appear on every test readout — power analysis, MDE, confidence…
Five statistical mistakes that derail new DTC testing teams, with practical checks for sample size, peeking, metrics, and interpretation.
A five-step method for learning from CRO case studies without mistaking curated success stories for representative evidence.
A plain-English guide to why selected extreme A/B test results often shrink, and why no universal discount can recover the true effect.
How outcome-dependent stopping changes A/B test error rates, why there is no universal peeking multiplier, and how to precommit a valid stopping rule.
The standard 3-tier pricing-page playbook — anchor + decoy + "Most Popular" badge — works under specific conditions. Here are the ones that break.
Dark patterns optimize for the next quarter. Bright patterns optimize for the next decade. The 12 alternatives, and why your A/B test will misjudge them.
Princeton found dark patterns on 11% of shopping sites. The FTC, EU, and California now regulate them. The 12-pattern taxonomy and what each costs you.
Krug's usability principles still hold — but the cost of misapplying them now compounds in places dashboards cannot see. The complete Krug-2026 reading list.
A practical framework for deciding which above-the-fold CTAs serve distinct intent and which create competition worth testing.
Use click-to-conversion ratios to find wrong-intent clicks, destination friction, and cannibalization hidden by aggregate CTA reports.
Use placement-level conversion and source intent to test whether a directional CTA result is genuinely additive or cannibalized.
Separate CTA visibility from intent match by comparing click-through, destination completion, and source-page context together.
Lessons from a historical enterprise testing ledger, with explicit limits on the denominator and no universal win-rate or device-performance benchmark.
How pre-specified mobile and desktop analysis can reveal heterogeneous CTA effects without claiming that device segmentation universally raises win rates.
Interpret time-on-page with conversion, scroll depth, and interaction data to separate faster decisions from abandonment or confusion.
Use behavioral diagnostics and explanatory content to test whether a benefit badge reduces uncertainty or adds friction.
Most teams discover A/B testing and immediately want to run more experiments. The logic seems sound: more tests mean more data, more data means better
The most expensive misreading in A/B testing is treating 'not statistically significant' as 'no difference.' It actually means 'we didn't collect enough…
Practical A/B testing frameworks, behavioral science, and CRO strategies for growth leaders responsible for revenue. Practical. Free. Weekly.
Opens Substack to confirm your subscription · Free · Unsubscribe anytime